Ethics of Culling Doubled-crested Cormorants Essay - 1

Ethics of Culling Doubled-crested Cormorants - Essay Example While the culling of DCCO can be justified as a necessity for the protection of rare plant life, it runs against the grain of the ethic of equal consideration. All living beings experience pain and humans do not have any moral right to cause pain to any other form of life. The action of culling DCCO is tantamount to â€Å"speciesist† action on the part of us humans. Through this action only what human’s believe are of importance is taken into consideration. The interest of DCCO within the species other than the human species is not considered important, and so ignored. The preserving of rare plant life places a utilitarian halo on the culling of DCCO, but in actuality it negates the ethic of equal consideration, and places a question mark on the moral rightness of the action. Ethical considerations act as a guide for action and behavioral attitudes that one should adopt for harmonious cohabitation in an environment. Thus, from the viewpoint of existence injustice some animals do not demonstrate a capacity for ethical functioning and reciprocation for harmonious cohabitation in an environment. This makes it difficult to apply the ethic of equality to all living beings (Singer, 49). However, while applying ethics to all living beings and justifying the use of ethics, it is only applicable to those living beings that are capable of reciprocating ethics in the form of human beings, and excluding those incapable of it, meaning all other forms of life. Furthermore, in the application of ethics personal interests and interests of a particular group or species are to be disregarded. There is the deficit among humans that value is given only to living beings capable of the display of ethical reciprocity. There are no moral grounds for basing value on the ethics of reciprocity (Springer, 20). . While DCCO are not justified in the danger they pose to the plant life on the island, they